
doi: 10.1002/cpt.1963
pmid: 32569424
A 2‐day meeting was held by members of the UK Quantitative Systems Pharmacology Network (<http://www.qsp‐uk.net/>) in November 2018 on the topic of Translational Challenges in Oncology. Participants from a wide range of backgrounds were invited to discuss current and emerging modeling applications in nonclinical and clinical drug development, and to identify areas for improvement. This resulting perspective explores opportunities for impactful quantitative pharmacology approaches. Four key themes arose from the presentations and discussions that were held, leading to the following recommendations: Evaluate the predictivity and reproducibility of animal cancer models through precompetitive collaboration. Apply mechanism of action (MoA) based mechanistic models derived from nonclinical data to clinical trial data. Apply MoA reflective models across trial data sets to more robustly quantify the natural history of disease and response to differing interventions. Quantify more robustly the dose and concentration dependence of adverse events through mathematical modelling techniques and modified trial design.
Clinical Trials as Topic, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Endpoint Determination, Antineoplastic Agents, Neoplasms, Experimental, Models, Theoretical, Medical Oncology, Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays, Tumor Burden, Translational Research, Biomedical, Pharmacokinetics; Pharmacodynamics; Oncology; Drug Development; Mathematical Modelling; Translation, Drug Development, Research Design, Cell Line, Tumor, Animals, Humans, Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors
Clinical Trials as Topic, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Endpoint Determination, Antineoplastic Agents, Neoplasms, Experimental, Models, Theoretical, Medical Oncology, Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays, Tumor Burden, Translational Research, Biomedical, Pharmacokinetics; Pharmacodynamics; Oncology; Drug Development; Mathematical Modelling; Translation, Drug Development, Research Design, Cell Line, Tumor, Animals, Humans, Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 12 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
