
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>doi: 10.1002/cpt.1097
pmid: 29920648
The use of botanicals, often in the form of multi‐ingredient herbal dietary supplements (HDS), has grown tremendously in the past three decades despite their unproven efficacy. This is paralleled by an increase in dietary supplement‐related health complications, notably hepatotoxicity. This article reviews the demographics and motivations of dietary supplement (DS) consumers and the regulatory framework for DS in the US and other developed countries. It examines in detail three groups of multi‐ingredient HDS associated with hepatotoxicity: OxyElite Pro (two formulations), green tea extract‐based DS, and “designer anabolic steroids.” These examples illustrate the difficulties in identifying and adjudicating causality of suspect compound(s) of multi‐ingredient HDS‐associated liver injury in the clinical setting. The article outlines future directions for further study of HDS‐associated hepatotoxicity as well as measures to safeguard the consumer against it.
Plants, Medicinal, Prognosis, Risk Assessment, Pharmacovigilance, Liver, Consumer Product Safety, Risk Factors, Terminology as Topic, Dietary Supplements, Toxicity Tests, Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems, Animals, Humans, Patient Safety, Plant Preparations, Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury, Phytotherapy
Plants, Medicinal, Prognosis, Risk Assessment, Pharmacovigilance, Liver, Consumer Product Safety, Risk Factors, Terminology as Topic, Dietary Supplements, Toxicity Tests, Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems, Animals, Humans, Patient Safety, Plant Preparations, Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury, Phytotherapy
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 29 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
