
doi: 10.1002/cpph.43 , 10.1002/cpz1.780
AbstractThe modified Irwin procedure or functional observational battery (FOB) can be used to achieve several goals. New chemical entities (NCEs) can be behaviorally screened for nervous system effects at a variety of doses to identify potential therapeutic uses and in the selection of appropriate doses for subsequent assays. NCEs can also be evaluated in the behavioral battery and compared with reference standards to assess liabilities in a new compound class, with an estimatedtherapeutic indexbeing suggested by the doses used in comparison to therapeutic doses. For the assessment of neurotoxicology, the FOB is often used. The differences between the two assays are subtle. The procedures used are essentially the same, but when considering neurotoxicology, the FOB is often conducted using GLP guidelines, with more animals being used per group, and doses that are low enough to determine a no effect level and high enough to induce marked nervous system behaviors. © 2018 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Central Nervous System, Male, Behavior, Animal, Drug Evaluation, Preclinical, Rodentia, Reference Standards, Risk Assessment, Rats, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Mice, Electric Power Supplies, Therapeutic Index, Animals, Biological Assay, Female, Nervous System Diseases
Central Nervous System, Male, Behavior, Animal, Drug Evaluation, Preclinical, Rodentia, Reference Standards, Risk Assessment, Rats, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Mice, Electric Power Supplies, Therapeutic Index, Animals, Biological Assay, Female, Nervous System Diseases
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 76 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
