
AbstractIdentifying the entirety of gene regulatory interactions in a biological system offers the possibility to determine the key molecular factors that affect important traits on the level of cells, tissues, and whole organisms. Despite the development of experimental approaches and technologies for identification of direct binding of transcription factors (TFs) to promoter regions of downstream target genes, computational approaches that utilize large compendia of transcriptomics data are still the predominant methods used to predict direct downstream targets of TFs, and thus reconstruct genome‐wide gene‐regulatory networks (GRNs). These approaches can broadly be categorized into unsupervised and supervised, based on whether data about known, experimentally verified gene‐regulatory interactions are used in the process of reconstructing the underlying GRN. Here, we first describe the generic steps of supervised approaches for GRN reconstruction, since they have been recently shown to result in improved accuracy of the resulting networks? We also illustrate how they can be used with data from model organisms to obtain more accurate prediction of gene regulatory interactions. © 2020 The Authors.Basic Protocol 1: Construction of features used in supervised learning of gene regulatory interactionsBasic Protocol 2: Learning the non‐interacting TF‐gene pairsBasic Protocol 3: Learning a classifier for gene regulatory interactions
580 Pflanzen (Botanik), Genome, Computational Biology, ddc:580, Gene Regulatory Networks, Supervised Machine Learning, Institut für Biochemie und Biologie, Transcription Factors
580 Pflanzen (Botanik), Genome, Computational Biology, ddc:580, Gene Regulatory Networks, Supervised Machine Learning, Institut für Biochemie und Biologie, Transcription Factors
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 13 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
