
AbstractWe study the micromechanics of collagen‐I gel with the goal of bridging the gap between theory and experiment in the study of biopolymer networks. Three‐dimensional images of fluorescently labeled collagen are obtained by confocal microscopy, and the network geometry is extracted using a 3D network skeletonization algorithm. Each fiber is modeled as an elastic beam that resists stretching and bending, and each crosslink is modeled as torsional spring. The stress–strain curves of networks at three different densities are compared with rheology measurements. The model shows good agreement with experiment, confirming that strain stiffening of collagen can be explained entirely by geometric realignment of the network, as opposed to entropic stiffening of individual fibers. The model also suggests that at small strains, crosslink deformation is the main contributer to network stiffness, whereas at large strains, fiber stretching dominates. As this modeling effort uses networks with realistic geometries, this analysis can ultimately serve as a tool for understanding how the mechanics of fibers and crosslinks at the microscopic level produce the macroscopic properties of the network. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Complexity 16: 22‐28, 2011
Condensed Matter - Materials Science, Mathematics and Statistics, Science (General), Science, Soft Condensed Matter (cond-mat.soft), Materials Science (cond-mat.mtrl-sci), FOS: Physical sciences, Condensed Matter - Soft Condensed Matter, 620
Condensed Matter - Materials Science, Mathematics and Statistics, Science (General), Science, Soft Condensed Matter (cond-mat.soft), Materials Science (cond-mat.mtrl-sci), FOS: Physical sciences, Condensed Matter - Soft Condensed Matter, 620
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 127 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
