
pmid: 29856902
AbstractPhotoluminescent carbon dots (CDs) fractions have been isolated from a gel‐like material (GM), which was synthesized using a convenient one‐step solvothermal route. In terms of purification, size exclusion chromatography (SEC) and dialysis were compared with acetone wash, which revealed the advantage of acetone wash. The pre‐purified GM with acetone wash (A‐GM) was further isolated by the reversed‐phase preparative thin layer chromatography (TLC) with acetonitrile−water mixture (7 : 3; va/vw) as the developing solvent. As a result, there were four photoluminescent bands on the TLC plate, which indicated the presence of four photoluminescent fractions. Detailed characterization measurements such as UV/Vis absorption, fluorescence emission, attenuated total reflection Fourier‐transform infrared spectroscopy, X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy, zeta potential, dynamic light scattering, atomic force microscopy, and TEM measurements were performed on all fractions to analyze their heterogeneous optical, structural, electrical, and morphological properties. Considering the comprehensive analysis, all isolated fractions were CDs. In addition, excitation wavelength‐independent CDs were obtained with a mean size of 2.5 nm and high quantum yield (55 %). Furthermore, the study demonstrates that the excitation wavelength‐dependent photoluminescence of GM could result from the mixture of different surface states of each CD fraction rather than multiple surface states of uniform CDs nanoparticles.
Chemistry, Heterogeneous fractions, Quantum dots, Physical Sciences and Mathematics, Photoluminescence, Fluorescence, Separation
Chemistry, Heterogeneous fractions, Quantum dots, Physical Sciences and Mathematics, Photoluminescence, Fluorescence, Separation
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 60 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
