
AbstractCarbon allotropes have been explored intensively by ab initio crystal structure prediction, but such methods are limited by the large computational cost of the underlying density functional theory (DFT). Here we show that a novel class of machine‐learning‐based interatomic potentials can be used for random structure searching and readily predicts several hitherto unknown carbon allotropes. Remarkably, our model draws structural information from liquid and amorphous carbon exclusively, and so does not have any prior knowledge of crystalline phases: it therefore demonstrates true transferability, which is a crucial prerequisite for applications in chemistry. The method is orders of magnitude faster than DFT and can, in principle, be coupled with any algorithm for structure prediction. Machine‐learning models therefore seem promising to enable large‐scale structure searches in the future.
machine learning, ab initio calculations, solid-state structures, carbon allotropes, high-throughput screening, Communications, Ab initio calculations; Carbon allotropes; High-throughput screening; Machine learning; Solid-state structures; Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics; Physical and Theoretical Chemistry
machine learning, ab initio calculations, solid-state structures, carbon allotropes, high-throughput screening, Communications, Ab initio calculations; Carbon allotropes; High-throughput screening; Machine learning; Solid-state structures; Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics; Physical and Theoretical Chemistry
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 86 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
