
doi: 10.1002/cpe.70251
ABSTRACTIn this study, an exam recommendation system was developed using the Beluga Whale Optimization (BWO) algorithm. The system generates balanced exams by selecting the most appropriate questions from a question bank consisting of approximately 12,285 questions according to difficulty, distinctiveness, and frequency of use in previous exams. The performance of BWO was compared with the classical Genetic Algorithm (GA), and it was observed that BWO works much faster and more effectively. For example, in the preparation of a 50‐question exam, BWO works in an average of 0.2424 s, while GA completes the same process in 0.5954 s. According to the targeted difficulty criteria, BWO gave results approximately 60 times faster than GA (0.0034 vs. 0.204 s). In addition, the statistical structure of the generated exams showed high agreement with the general characteristics of the question bank. Significance tests (Kolmogorov–Smirnov and Anderson‐Darling) supported this agreement. In the results of the survey conducted with academicians, 76.9% positive feedback was received, and the performance of the system was evaluated with a score of 9.31 out of 10.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
