
doi: 10.1002/cpe.4120
SummaryThis paper presents an alternative method to parallelize programs, better suited to manycore processors than actual operating system–/API‐based approaches likeOpenMPandMPI. The method relies on a parallelizing hardware and an adapted programming style. It frees and captures the instruction‐level parallelism (ILP). A many‐core design is presented in which cores are multithreaded and able to fork new threads. The programming style is based on functions. The hardware creates a concurrent thread at each function call. The programming style and the hardware create the conditions to free the ILP, by eliminating the architectural dependences between a call and its continuation after return. We illustrate the method on a sum reduction, a matrix multiplication and a sort. We measure the ILP of the parallel runs and show that it is high enough to feed thousands of cores because it increases with data size. We compare our method topthreadparallelization, showing that (1) our parallel execution is deterministic, (2) our thread management is cheap, (3) our parallelism is implicit, and (4) our method parallelizes functions and loops. Implicit parallelism makes parallel code easy to write and read. Deterministic parallel execution makes parallel code easy to debug.
[INFO.INFO-AR] Computer Science [cs]/Hardware Architecture [cs.AR], Parallel locality, Parallelizing core, Multithreading, MapReduce, Manycore processor, Deterministic parallelism, Computing model
[INFO.INFO-AR] Computer Science [cs]/Hardware Architecture [cs.AR], Parallel locality, Parallelizing core, Multithreading, MapReduce, Manycore processor, Deterministic parallelism, Computing model
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
