
doi: 10.1002/cpdd.786
pmid: 32212418
AbstractThe effects of supratherapeutic doses of intravenous (IV) relebactam on duration of ventricular depolarization and subsequent repolarization were assessed in a thorough QT/corrected QT study. This was a single‐dose, double‐blind (relebactam only), randomized, placebo‐ and positive‐controlled, 3‐period, balanced crossover study in healthy participants. Participants received in randomized order, and separated by a washout (≥4 days), a single dose of IV relebactam 1150 mg, oral moxifloxacin 400 mg (open‐label positive control), and IV placebo. Least squares mean and 2‐sided 90% confidence interval for change from baseline in population‐derived corrected QT intervals for relebactam, moxifloxacin, and placebo were estimated for 24 hours. The upper limit of the 90% confidence interval of all least squares mean population‐derived corrected QT treatment differences from placebo was not >10 milliseconds at any time point for 24 hours. Corrected QT assay sensitivity was confirmed with moxifloxacin treatment. Analysis of electrocardiogram parameters resulted in no additional cardiac safety concerns. Overall, a supratherapeutic dose of relebactam yielded no cardiac safety events; the 1150‐mg supratherapeutic dose (4.6‐fold above the 250‐mg therapeutic dose) was not associated with QT prolongation or other abnormal cardiodynamic parameters. This study lends additional support to relebactam's use as a β‐lactamase inhibitor in antimicrobial therapy.
Cross-Over Studies, Heart Rate, Moxifloxacin, Humans, Azabicyclo Compounds, Healthy Volunteers
Cross-Over Studies, Heart Rate, Moxifloxacin, Humans, Azabicyclo Compounds, Healthy Volunteers
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 3 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
