Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Cancerarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Cancer
Article
Data sources: UnpayWall
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Cancer
Article . 2009 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
Cancer
Article . 2009
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Mucinous gastric carcinomas

Clinicopathologic and molecular analyses
Authors: Jong Sun, Choi; Min A, Kim; Hee Eun, Lee; Hye Seung, Lee; Woo Ho, Kim;

Mucinous gastric carcinomas

Abstract

AbstractBACKGROUND:Mucinous gastric carcinoma (MGC) is characterized by substantial mucous lakes within tumors and comprises 3% of gastric carcinomas at the authors' institute.METHODS:The authors analyzed the clinicopathologic characteristics, mucin gene expression profiles, microsatellite instability (MSI), and status of the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER‐2) and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) genes in 133 MGCs and compared them with the same variables in nonmucinous gastric carcinomas (NMGCs). In addition, the prognostic implications of clinicopathologic parameters were evaluated.RESULTS:Patients who had MGC had deeper invasion (P = .003), more frequent lymph node metastasis (P < .001), more advanced pathologic stage (P < .001), more frequent lymphatic invasion (P < .001), and lower disease‐specific survival rates (P < .0001) than patients who had NMGC. However, a mucinous histology per se was not identified as an independent prognostic factor. Negative mucin 1, cell surface associated (MUC1) status (P < .001); positive mucin 2, oligomeric mucus/gel‐forming (MUC2) status (P < .001); negative mucin 5AC, oligomeric mucus/gel‐forming (MUC5AC) status (P = .036); and negative mucin 6, oligomeric mucus/gel‐forming (MUC6) status (P < .001) were more frequent in MGCs. The frequency of MSI in MGC was not significantly different from that in NMGC. MGCs had a significantly lower incidence of HER‐2 protein overexpression (P = .046), HER‐2 gene amplification (P = .009), and EGFR protein overexpression (P = .017) than NMGCs; and multivariate analysis identified EGFR overexpression as a factor associated with a poor prognosis (P = .047). Patients with MGC who had a predominance of signet ring cells in mucin pools had poorer disease‐specific survival than patients who had MGC with predominant tubular differentiation (P = .017).CONCLUSIONS:The clinicopathologic and molecular characteristics of MGCs differed from those of NMGCs. Furthermore, the results indicated that EGFR overexpression and histologic subtyping by predominant tumor cell type in mucin pools may be helpful for predicting clinical outcome in patients with MGC. Cancer 2009. © 2009 American Cancer Society.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Male, Gastric Mucins, Gene Amplification, Genes, erbB-1, Genes, erbB-2, Middle Aged, Prognosis, Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous, DNA Mismatch Repair, Disease-Free Survival, Stomach Neoplasms, Humans, Female, Microsatellite Instability

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    52
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
52
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
bronze
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research