
pmid: 24891085
AbstractPhytol was chemically transformed into fifteen semi‐synthetic derivatives, which were evaluated for their antibacterial and drug resistance reversal potential in combination with nalidixic acid against E. coli strains CA8000 and DH5α. The pivaloyl (4), 3,4,5‐trimethoxybenzoyl (9), 2,3‐dichlorobenzoyl (10), cinnamoyl (11), and aldehyde (14) derivatives of phytol ((2E,7R,11R)‐3,7,11,15‐tetramethyl‐2‐hexadecen‐1‐ol) were evaluated by using another antibiotic, tetracycline, against the MDREC‐KG4 clinical isolate of E. coli. Derivative 4 decreased the maximal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of the antibiotics by 16‐fold, while derivatives 9, 10, 11, and 14 reduced MIC values of the antibiotics up to eightfold against the E. coli strains. Derivatives 4, 9, 10, 11, and 14 inhibited the ATP‐dependent efflux pump; this was also supported by their in silico binding affinity and down‐regulation of the efflux pump gene yojI, which encodes the multidrug ATP‐binding cassette transporter protein. This study supports the possible use of phytol derivatives in the development of cost‐effective antibacterial combinations.
Binding Sites, Escherichia coli Proteins, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Protein Structure, Tertiary, Molecular Docking Simulation, Phytol, Drug Resistance, Bacterial, Escherichia coli, ATP-Binding Cassette Transporters
Binding Sites, Escherichia coli Proteins, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Protein Structure, Tertiary, Molecular Docking Simulation, Phytol, Drug Resistance, Bacterial, Escherichia coli, ATP-Binding Cassette Transporters
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 35 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
