AbstractParticipants reported perceptions of fairness after reading 1 of 72 scenarios describing a disciplinary discussion between a manager and an employee (crossing four different disciplinary infractions, with three types of explanations for each infraction, three different levels of discipline severity, and two types of employee attributions for their behaviour). Results indicate that type of attribution, type of infraction, and level of discipline severity all have significant effects on perceptions of distributive, procedural, interpersonal, and informational justice. Type of explanation also has significant effects on perceptions of justice other than informational justice. It appears that managing disciplinary fairness may require a contingency approach. Copyright © 2008 ASAC. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.