
doi: 10.1002/chir.23076
pmid: 31136021
AbstractMost amino acids contain chiral centres and exist as both D‐enantiomer and L‐enantiomer. The optically pure enantiomer is often more valuable than the racemate. Enzymatic resolution provides an effective strategy to obtain optically pure amino acids but often results in large amounts of unwanted isomer. In this study, optically pure L‐glufosinate (L‐PPT) was obtained by coupling amidase‐mediated hydrolysis of N‐phenylacetyl‐D,L‐glufosinate with racemization of N‐phenylacetyl‐D‐glufosinate (NPDG), which exclusively exhibits effective herbicidal properties compared with its D‐enantiomer. To improve the yield of L‐PPT, the racemization reaction conditions were optimized, and through single‐factor experiments, the optimal reaction temperature, reaction time, and mole ratio of phenylacetic acid to NPDG were determined to be 150°C, 30 minutes, and 1.5, respectively. The response surface methodology was applied to further optimize the racemization conditions, and the final yield of L‐PPT reached 96.13% with optimum reaction temperature of 154°C, reaction time of 23 minutes, and phenylacetic acid/NPDG mole ratio of 1.7, respectively. Moreover, adding a small amount of acetic anhydride further raised the yield of L‐PPT to 97.02%.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 13 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
