Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ce/papersarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ce/papers
Article . 2025 . Peer-reviewed
License: CC BY
Data sources: Crossref
addClaim

Out‐of‐plane stability of CFST parabolic arches

Authors: Cong Li; Yue Geng; Nadir Albo; Ida Mascolo; Federico Guarracino; Gaetano Della Corte;

Out‐of‐plane stability of CFST parabolic arches

Abstract

Abstract Owing to their superior composite performance, concrete‐filled steel tubular (CFST) arches have been increasingly employed in bridge construction, with parabolic arches accounting for nearly half of such applications. The excellent mechanical properties of CFST arches often lead to slender designs, making their out‐of‐plane stability a critical concern. However, existing research and design standards primarily focus on circular arches, with limited studies addressing the out‐of‐plane stability of parabolic arches. This study investigates the out‐of‐plane buckling behavior of CFST parabolic arches subjected to vertically distributed loads along the span. In this paper, a theoretical framework for analyzing out‐of‐plane buckling is adopted using energy principles and a generalized Ritz method. The theoretical solutions were subsequently compared with numerical solutions obtained with finite elements models. The comparison shows agreement in internal force distributions and buckling loads.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
hybrid
Related to Research communities