
doi: 10.1002/cepa.2600
handle: 2268/305835
AbstractSteel frames subjected to a column removal typically exhibit a complex load resisting mechanism characterised by three contributions: i) beam yielding mechanism, ii) compressive arch, and iii) catenary action. The development of compressive arch actions in the beams bridging over the lost column has not been yet thoroughly investigated in steel frames, although such effects proved to significantly contribute to the collapse‐resistance of reinforced concrete frames.This paper aims at shedding light on the compressive arch actions of steel beams in case of column removals accounting for various boundary conditions. Numerical and analytical methods were employed for quantifying the contribution of these effects to the structural robustness of steel frames. A simplified analytical model that allows estimating the magnitude of arching effects in steel beams with various types of end‐connections and horizontal restraints provided by the surrounding structure was introduced. The agreement between numerical and analytical results suggests that the proposed analytical model allows for accurate predictions. This validates the model's use for practical applications and gives promising prospects for its inclusion in consistent analytical methods for predicting the activated alternative load path in steel frames subjected to a column loss scenario.
Collapse resistance, Ingénierie civile, Column loss, Steel frames, Civil engineering, Robustness, Arching effects, Engineering, computing & technology, Ingénierie, informatique & technologie
Collapse resistance, Ingénierie civile, Column loss, Steel frames, Civil engineering, Robustness, Arching effects, Engineering, computing & technology, Ingénierie, informatique & technologie
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
