
doi: 10.1002/cem.3477
Abstract This paper introduces the multiple domain‐invariant partial least squares (mdi‐PLS) method, which generalizes the recently introduced domain‐invariant partial least squares method (di‐PLS). In contrast to di‐PLS which solely allows transferring of knowledge from a single source to a single target domain, the proposed approach enables the incorporation of data from an arbitrary number of domains. Additionally, mdi‐PLS offers a high level of flexibility by accepting labeled (supervised) and unlabeled (unsupervised) data to cope with dataset shifts. We demonstrate the application of the mdi‐PLS method on a simulated and one real‐world dataset. Our results show a clear outperformance of both PLS and di‐PLS when data from multiple related domains are available for training multivariate calibration models underpinning the benefit of mdi‐PLS.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 11 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
