
doi: 10.1002/cem.1180
handle: 11250/2438414
AbstractThe well‐known nonlinear iterative partial least squares (NIPALS) algorithm is commonly used for computation of components in partial least squares regression (PLSR) with orthogonalized score vectors. Based on generalized inverse formalism, Pell et al.[1] have recently claimed that the NIPALS results are inconsistent with respect to model spaces for residual‐based outlier detection and prediction purposes. This theoretically important result is supported by the present paper, where it is also shown that a simple re‐interpretation of the results from the NIPALS algorithm solves the problem. This is valid for cases with both one and several response variables (PLS1 and PLS2). It is also shown, however, that the price to pay for this solution is that the latent variables in the model will no longer be completely independent of the residual noise. Since the original PLSR model with non‐orthogonal score vectors does not have the same inconsistency, a method for orthogonalization of this model is also included. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
PLSR, NIPALS, Model inconsistency, Orthogonalization, 563
PLSR, NIPALS, Model inconsistency, Orthogonalization, 563
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 17 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
