Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Catheterization and ...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
Article . 2024 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

External validation of the SYNTAX score II 2020 in patients with chronic renal insufficiency

Authors: Mengyao Li; Xu Liu; Mao Jiang; Yumeng Lei; Wenjie Liu; Zhongpei Li; Shicheng Li; +3 Authors

External validation of the SYNTAX score II 2020 in patients with chronic renal insufficiency

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundThe SYNTAX score Ⅱ 2020 (SSⅡ‐2020) was created as a customized decision‐making tool for individuals diagnosed with complex coronary artery disease (CAD). Nevertheless, there has been a scarcity of research investigating the long‐term predictive significance of SSⅡ‐2020 for patients with both CAD and chronic renal insufficiency (CRI) who undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).AimsWe sought to showcase the prognostic capacity of SSII‐2020 in evaluating long‐term all‐cause mortality (ACM) within this high‐risk patient cohort.MethodsA retrospective cohort comprising 1156 individuals diagnosed with CRI and exhibiting left main CAD, three‐vessel CAD or both was included in this investigation. We categorized participants into three groups based on the optimal SSII‐2020 threshold for predicting long‐term ACM, determined using the X‐tile software.ResultsAt the median follow‐up duration of 6.3 years, the ACM rates were determined to be 10% in the low, 17% in the moderate, and 28% in the high SSII‐2020 groups (p < 0.001). Employing multivariate Cox regression analysis, it was observed that the high SSII‐2020 group exhibited a 3.289‐fold increased risk of ACM (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.229–4.856, p < 0.001) compared with the low SSII‐2020 group, whereas the high SSII‐2020 group displayed a 1.757‐fold (95% CI: 1.190–2.597, p = 0.005) in comparison to the median SSII‐2020 groups. Compared with SSII, the SSII‐2020 had an incremental value for predicting 7‐year ACM (C‐index: 0.662 vs. 0.534, p = 0.007; IDI: 0.016, p < 0.001).ConclusionsSSII‐2020 enhances long‐term ACM prediction, facilitates improved risk stratification, and improves clinical utility for PCI patients with complex CAD and CRI.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Treatment Outcome, Risk Factors, Humans, Coronary Artery Disease, Renal Insufficiency, Chronic, Risk Assessment, Retrospective Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    1
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
1
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!