
doi: 10.1002/ccd.26870
pmid: 27860249
ObjectivesWe report the initial experience of percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) closure with the Ultraseal device.BackgroundLAA closure is an alternative to oral anticoagulation for stroke prevention in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) and high risk of bleeding. The Ultraseal device is a new LAA closure prosthesis that consists of a distal soft bulb and a proximal sail attached by an articulating joint that allows a high degree of device conformability to the different variations of the LAA anatomy.MethodsWe included 12 consecutive patients with NVAF who underwent LAA closure with the Ultraseal device between January and December 2015 in our center. Patients had clinical and transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) examinations at baseline and at 45 days following LAA closure.ResultsThe device was successfully implanted in all patients, with no periprocedural complications. There were no episodes of bleeding, stroke, pericardial effusion, or device embolization at 45‐day follow‐up. No cases with residual leaks >5 mm were observed at TEE. One patient presented a device related thrombus without clinical consequences.ConclusionsThis initial experience with the Ultraseal LAA closure device demonstrates preliminary safety and feasibility. Further larger studies with longer follow‐up are warranted. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Aged, 80 and over, Male, Cardiac Catheterization, Time Factors, Echocardiography, Three-Dimensional, Prosthesis Design, Radiography, Interventional, Treatment Outcome, Atrial Fibrillation, Feasibility Studies, Humans, Atrial Appendage, Female, Echocardiography, Transesophageal, Aged, Preliminary Data
Aged, 80 and over, Male, Cardiac Catheterization, Time Factors, Echocardiography, Three-Dimensional, Prosthesis Design, Radiography, Interventional, Treatment Outcome, Atrial Fibrillation, Feasibility Studies, Humans, Atrial Appendage, Female, Echocardiography, Transesophageal, Aged, Preliminary Data
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 19 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
