
AbstractTranscatheter atrial septal defect (ASD) closure has proven to be safe and effective, and it is rapidly becoming the standard treatment for secundum‐type ASDs. However, device embolization occurs in about 0.55% of cases, regardless of ASD and device size and/or physician's expertise. Percutaneous retrieval of the embolized device is possible in about 50% of cases, and several techniques have been described, including the use of large sheaths, gooseneck snares, or bioptomes. This is the first successful and reported case of retrieval of an embolized amplatzer septal occluder (ASO) from the left ventricle that was achieved by using a modified snare technique. This was done after an unsuccessful attempt at retrieval with a bioptome that led to a never previously reported complication. Of the 32 reported cases of ASO embolization, percutaneous retrieval was successful in 16 cases (50%) and none were obtained following left ventricular embolization. Even in experienced hands, the observed rate of embolization when using an ASO device is not negligible. Percutaneous retrieval is also possible from the left ventricle but in some cases nonstandardized devices and strategies may be required. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Male, Cardiac Catheterization, Heart Ventricles, Equipment Design, Middle Aged, Coronary Angiography, Radiography, Interventional, Heart Septal Defects, Atrial, Treatment Outcome, Foreign-Body Migration, Tachycardia, Ventricular, Humans, Device Removal
Male, Cardiac Catheterization, Heart Ventricles, Equipment Design, Middle Aged, Coronary Angiography, Radiography, Interventional, Heart Septal Defects, Atrial, Treatment Outcome, Foreign-Body Migration, Tachycardia, Ventricular, Humans, Device Removal
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 18 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
