
pmid: 8348594
AbstractThere are few data concerning the complications and technical difficulties encountered when cardiac catheterization is performed using peripheral bypass grafts for vascular access. All cardiac catheterizations performed at our institution from January 1, 1984 to April 1, 1991 were retrospectively reviewed to assess the in‐hospital clinical outcomes in patients who had arterial access for catheterization achieved via prosthetic graft puncture. Seventeen procedures had percutaneous puncture of a vascular graft from a total of 2,929 arterial catheterizations performed. The interval from graft placement to catheterization was 7.5 ± 1.1 years. Arterial sheaths were employed in all cases and corresponded to the catheter size, with 5F systems used in 53% and 7F or larger systems used in the remaining patients. No intraprocedural or postprocedural complications were recognized. Technical difficulties were limited to the inability to selectively cannulate a nondominant right coronary artery in 1 patient. We conclude that percutaneous introduction of an arterial sheath and left heart catheterization via remotely implanted vascular bypass grafts is not associated with an increased risk of procedural complications or technical difficulties. © 1993 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Male, Cardiac Catheterization, Leg, Graft Occlusion, Vascular, Middle Aged, Coronary Angiography, Iliac Artery, Blood Vessel Prosthesis, Femoral Artery, Postoperative Complications, Ischemia, Humans, Female, Aorta, Abdominal, Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary, Follow-Up Studies
Male, Cardiac Catheterization, Leg, Graft Occlusion, Vascular, Middle Aged, Coronary Angiography, Iliac Artery, Blood Vessel Prosthesis, Femoral Artery, Postoperative Complications, Ischemia, Humans, Female, Aorta, Abdominal, Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary, Follow-Up Studies
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 8 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
