
doi: 10.1002/cbf.2875
pmid: 23001693
The capacity of cartilage self‐regeneration is considered to be limited. Joint injuries often evolve in the development of chronic wounds on the cartilage surface. Such lesions are associated with articular cartilage degeneration and osteoarthritis. Re‐establishing a correct micro/macro‐environment into damaged joints could stop or prevent the degenerative processes. This study investigated the effect of polydeoxyribonucleotides (PDRNs) on cartilage degradation in vitro and on cartilage extracted cells. The activities of matrix metalloproteinases 2 and 9 were measured in PDRN‐treated cells and in controls at days 0 and 30 of culture. Human nasal cartilage explants were cultured, and the degree of proteoglycan degradation was assessed by measuring the amount of glycosaminoglycans released into the culture medium. The PDRN properties compared with controls were tested on cartilage tissues to evaluate deposition of extracellular matrix. Chondrocytes treated with PDRNs showed a physiological deposition of extracellular matrix (aggrecan and type II collagen: Western blot, IFA, fluorescence activated cell sorting, Alcian blue and safranin O staining). PDRNs were able to inhibit proteoglycan degradation in cartilage explants. The activities of matrix metalloproteinases 2 and 9 were reduced in all PDRN‐treated samples. Our results indicate that PDRNs are suitable for a long‐term cultivation of in vitro cartilage and have therapeutic effects on chondrocytes by protecting cartilage. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Adult, Cell Survival, Protective Agents, Extracellular Matrix, Chondrocytes, Polydeoxyribonucleotides, Matrix Metalloproteinase 9, Nasal Cartilages, Humans, Matrix Metalloproteinase 2, Aggrecans, Collagen Type II, Cells, Cultured
Adult, Cell Survival, Protective Agents, Extracellular Matrix, Chondrocytes, Polydeoxyribonucleotides, Matrix Metalloproteinase 9, Nasal Cartilages, Humans, Matrix Metalloproteinase 2, Aggrecans, Collagen Type II, Cells, Cultured
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 44 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
