Views provided by UsageCounts
AbstractThe antimicrobial activities of chloroform, acetone and two different concentrations of methanol extracts of Artemisia dracunculus L. were studied. These extracts were tested against nine bacteria and four yeasts strains by the disc diffusion method. The results indicated that the methanol extract of A. dracunculus is more effective against tested microorganisms than chloroform or acetone extracts. The chloroform and acetone extracts were inhibitory only towards Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ATCC 27853). While the methanol extract that was diluted with 10 ml distilled water showed inhibition zones against Shigella (RSHI), Listeria monocytogenes ATCC 7644, P. aeruginosa (ATCC 27853), the methanol extract that was diluted with 5 ml distilled water showed inhibition zones against two different strains of Escherichia coli (RSHI, ATCC 25922), Shigella (RSHI), L. monocytogenes (ATCC 7644), and P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853. The cells of microorganisms treated with plant extracts and normal microorganism cells were observed by scanning electron microscope. It was apparent that cells are damaged after treatment with A. dracunculus. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
antimicrobial activity, Plant Extracts, Methanol, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Listeria monocytogenes, Acetone, Anti-Infective Agents, Artemisia, Species Specificity, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, disc diffusion method, Escherichia coli, Microscopy, Electron, Scanning, Artemisia dracunculus L., Chloroform, Shigella, Candida
antimicrobial activity, Plant Extracts, Methanol, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Listeria monocytogenes, Acetone, Anti-Infective Agents, Artemisia, Species Specificity, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, disc diffusion method, Escherichia coli, Microscopy, Electron, Scanning, Artemisia dracunculus L., Chloroform, Shigella, Candida
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 38 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 22 |

Views provided by UsageCounts