
pmid: 40638915
ABSTRACT Musa paradisiaca and Musa sapientum are among the most prevalent medicinal plants of the genus Musa (Musaceae family) that have therapeutic potential, as indicated by preclinical evidence, against Diabetes mellitus , hypercholesterolemia, microbial infections, hyperlipidemia, inflammation, and oxidative stress. Over the past few decades, both Musa species have been utilized in ethnomedicinal practices to manage symptoms of diarrhea, epilepsy, diabetes, dysentery, ulcers, and hair loss, without a clear understanding of their mode of action and the phytochemicals responsible for these effects. Different plant parts (roots, fruits, peels, stems, bracts, flowers, and inflorescences) contain numerous phytochemicals, such as flavonoids, alkaloids, saponins, essential oils, vitamins, gallic acid, syringin, and caffeic acid, which are responsible for their pharmacological properties. This review presents a comparative study of phytochemistry and various pharmacological properties, including antidiabetic, antioxidant, and anti‐inflammatory effects, of different parts of M. sapientum and M. paradisiaca . This review aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of the pharmacological activities of these plants and help scientists gain a thorough knowledge of the multipurpose plants as potential substitutes for synthetic drugs in the future.
Plant Extracts, Phytochemicals, Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Animals, Musa, Antioxidants
Plant Extracts, Phytochemicals, Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Animals, Musa, Antioxidants
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
