
pmid: 20491073
AbstractTwo strategies for fighting cancer by modulating FASL‐induced apoptosis were modeled by 2D‐cellular automata. Our models predict that cancer cells can be killed by maximizing the apoptosis via joint suppression of FLIP and IAP inhibitors by siRNA and SMAC proteins, respectively. It was also predicted that the presumed feedback loop CASP3→CASP9→|IAP in the intrinsic pathway accelerates the apoptosis, but does not change significantly the concentration of DFF40, the protein that decomposes DNA. The alternative strategy of preventing the killing of the immune system's T‐cells, via minimizing their tumor‐induced FAS‐L apoptosis by overexpression of FLIP and IAP, was also shown to be promising with a predicted considerable synergy action of the two inhibitors. Dual suppression or overexpression of apoptosis inhibitors emerges thus as promising approach in the fight against cancer. Our modeling has also brought some light on the process of turning type‐I cells into type‐II ones, which emerges as compensatory mechanism in case of damaged or silenced FASL pathway by preserving about the same self‐death level at only 10–12% lower performance rate.
Fas Ligand Protein, Cell Line, Tumor, Fas-Associated Death Domain Protein, Neoplasms, Humans, Apoptosis, RNA, Small Interfering, Models, Biological, Oligopeptides, Inhibitor of Apoptosis Proteins
Fas Ligand Protein, Cell Line, Tumor, Fas-Associated Death Domain Protein, Neoplasms, Humans, Apoptosis, RNA, Small Interfering, Models, Biological, Oligopeptides, Inhibitor of Apoptosis Proteins
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 7 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
