Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Cancer Medicinearrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Cancer Medicine
Article . 2025 . Peer-reviewed
License: CC BY
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

Assessing NODM Patients for Early PDAC Diagnosis: Incidence of NODM Before PDAC Diagnosis and Subsequent PDAC Risk

Authors: Satish Munigala; Benjamin Bowe; Divya S. Subramaniam; Hong Xian; Arna N. Gowda; Sunil G. Sheth; Rajiv Chhabra; +2 Authors

Assessing NODM Patients for Early PDAC Diagnosis: Incidence of NODM Before PDAC Diagnosis and Subsequent PDAC Risk

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background New‐Onset Diabetes Mellitus (NODM) is often an early manifestation of pancreatic cancer (Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma, PDAC). However, there is limited information about (1) the duration prior to PDAC diagnosis when the annual incidence of NODM starts significantly exceeding that in age‐matched controls, (2) the percentage of PDAC patients diagnosed with NODM in the years preceding, and (3) the risk of PDAC following NODM in time when the PDAC risk is significantly higher than in controls. Methods Using the nationwide VA database, we evaluated the annual incidence of NODM for 15 years preceding the PDAC diagnosis and in the age‐ and sex‐matched controls (1:5 matching). In the second part, we evaluated the long‐term risk and predictors of PDAC in NODM patients and controls. Results The case–control study comprised 8198 PDAC patients and 40,992 matched controls. The higher annual incidence of NODM in PDAC patients was statistically significant up to 15 years before PDAC diagnosis. 69.2% of PDAC patients had NODM in the preceding 15 years versus 38.0% of controls. PDAC risk in the 15 years following NODM was 0.60% compared to 0.13% in the controls (aHR 3.83, 95% CI 3.68–3.98, p < 0.001). The risk of PDAC is more pronounced in the 1 year following NODM (aHR 9.07, 95% CI 8.33–9.87) than the subsequent 5 years (aHR 2.98, 95% CI 2.82–3.15). Conclusion NODM pre‐dates PDAC diagnosis in most patients with PDAC. Further evaluation of NODM patients for PDAC has the potential to become a feasible strategy for diagnosing more early‐stage resectable PDACs.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    4
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
4
Top 10%
Average
Top 10%
Green
gold
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research