
AbstractObjectivesThis study aimed to investigate the incidence, consequences, and predictors of serious chemotherapy‐induced thrombocytopenia (CIT) in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC).Materials and MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed the clinical records of patients with NPC between 2013 and 2015. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression model and propensity score matching were used to estimate the effect of serious CIT on overall survival. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were applied to identify the predictors of serious CIT.Results and ConclusionThe incidence of serious CIT was 5.21% in patients with NPC. Patients who experienced serious thrombocytopenia had a worse long‐term prognosis, while the difference in short‐term survival rate was slight. Chemotherapy regimens of gemcitabine and platinum, 5‐fluorouracil and platinum, taxane and platinum, serum potassium ion concentration, serum lactate dehydrogenase levels, platelet count, red blood cell count, and estimated glomerular filtration rate were predictors of serious CIT.
Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, nasopharyngeal carcinoma, Incidence, Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens, predictor, thrombocytopenia, Antineoplastic Agents, Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms, chemotherapy, Prognosis, Thrombocytopenia, RESEARCH ARTICLES, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Humans, RC254-282, Platinum, Retrospective Studies
Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, nasopharyngeal carcinoma, Incidence, Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens, predictor, thrombocytopenia, Antineoplastic Agents, Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms, chemotherapy, Prognosis, Thrombocytopenia, RESEARCH ARTICLES, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Humans, RC254-282, Platinum, Retrospective Studies
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 4 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
