
doi: 10.1002/bsl.811
pmid: 18548515
AbstractThe Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) encompasses one of the largest telemental health networks in the world, with over 45,000 videoconferencing and over 5,000 home telemental health encounters annually. Recently, the VA designated suicide prevention as a major priority, with telehealth modalities providing opportunities for remote interventions. Suicide risk assessments, using videoconferencing, are now documented in the literature, as are current studies that find telemental health to be equivalent to face‐to‐face treatment.Remote assessment of suicidality, however, involves complex legal issues: licensing requirements for remote delivery of care, legal procedures for involuntary detainment and commitment of potentially harmful patients, and liability questions related to the remote nature of the mental health service. VA best practices for remote suicide risk assessment include paradigms for establishing procedures in the context of legal challenges (licensing and involuntary detainment/commitment), for utilizing clinical assessment and triage decision protocols, and for contingency planning to optimize patient care and reduce liability. Published in 2008 by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Suicide Prevention, Quality Assurance, Health Care, Remote Consultation, Malpractice, Licensure, Medical, Risk Assessment, United States, Commitment of Persons with Psychiatric Disorders, Suicide, Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care, Dangerous Behavior, Videoconferencing, Humans, Veterans
Suicide Prevention, Quality Assurance, Health Care, Remote Consultation, Malpractice, Licensure, Medical, Risk Assessment, United States, Commitment of Persons with Psychiatric Disorders, Suicide, Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care, Dangerous Behavior, Videoconferencing, Humans, Veterans
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 77 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
