
doi: 10.1002/bse.70017
ABSTRACT Corporate environmental, social and governance (ESG) performance has drawn much attention. This study examines the effects of corporate strategic ESG disclosure behaviour. Specifically, we test the impact of corporate ESG washing on the divergence of ESG rating agencies. The results show that a greater degree of corporate ESG washing leads to greater ESG rating divergence. This impact is driven mostly by greenwashing within the environmental dimension of ESG. Furthermore, the positive relationship is stronger when there is more private information available, when firms are rated by a less accurate ESG rating agency and when firms have more volatile and complex operating activities and are located in regions with volatile ESG concerns than under other conditions. Finally, the results show that rating divergence negatively affects stock liquidity. In summary, this study suggests that firms' ESG washing behaviour increases the degree of information asymmetry and uncertainty among rating agencies, ultimately leading to rating divergence. Our findings have important implications for ESG development.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 8 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
