
Abstract Background Research on personality in sport is popular because it allows you to forecast the greediness of actions in sports competition situations. The purpose of this paper is to determine which personality traits characterize individual sports champions. Materials and Methods The subjects of the research were Polish athletes ( N = 600) between 20 and 29 years of age from 20 individual sports disciplines (each n = 30). Then, a sample of champions ( n = 56) and other individual disciplines athletes ( n = 544) was selected from the study population. The Big Five model was used to examine their personality (NEO‐FFI). Results Individual sports champions were characterized by a lower level of neuroticism, a higher level of extraversion, agreeableness, and conscientiousness in relation to other athletes. Conclusion Each sports discipline is characterized by slightly different psychological requirements for athletes. The undertaken sports activity shapes the personality, and the shaped personality traits have an impact on taking solutions in the starting situation. The level of intensity of neuroticism, extraversion, agreeableness, and conscientiousness may determine the result in competition in individual sports.
NEO—five‐factor inventory, Neuroticism, Personality Inventory, Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry, championship, psychology, Personality Disorders, sport psychology, personality, Humans, behavioral psychology, RC321-571, Original Research, Personality, Sports
NEO—five‐factor inventory, Neuroticism, Personality Inventory, Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry, championship, psychology, Personality Disorders, sport psychology, personality, Humans, behavioral psychology, RC321-571, Original Research, Personality, Sports
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 46 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
