
doi: 10.1002/bmc.1659
pmid: 21721022
ABSTRACTThe development and validation of an LC‐MS/MS method for the simultaneous determination of albendazole metabolites (albendazole sulfoxide and albendazole sulfone) in human plasma are described. Samples of 200 μL were extracted with ether–dichloromethane–chloroform (60:30:10, v/v/v). The chromatographic separation was performed using a C18 column with methanol–formic acid 20 mmol/L (70:30) as the mobile phase. The method was linear in a range of 20–5000 ng/mL for albendazole sulfoxide and 10–1500 ng/mL for albendazole sulfone. For both analytes the method was precise (RSD < 12%) and accurate (RE <7%) with high recovery (>90%). The method was successfully applied to determine the plasma and cerebrospinal fluid levels of albendazole sulfoxide and albendazole sulfone in patients with subarachnoidal neurocysticercosis who received albendazole at 30 mg/kg per day for 7 days. This LC‐MS/MS method yielded a quick, simple and reliable protocol for determining albendazole sulfoxide and albendazole sulfone concentrations in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid samples and is applicable to therapeutic monitoring. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Anthelmintics, Reproducibility of Results, Albendazole, Neurocysticercosis, Sensitivity and Specificity, Drug Stability, Tandem Mass Spectrometry, Linear Models, Humans, Chromatography, Liquid
Anthelmintics, Reproducibility of Results, Albendazole, Neurocysticercosis, Sensitivity and Specificity, Drug Stability, Tandem Mass Spectrometry, Linear Models, Humans, Chromatography, Liquid
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 21 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
