
doi: 10.1002/bjs.9604
pmid: 25123479
Abstract Background Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) is a safe and effective single-stage treatment for choledocholithiasis in the elective setting. The outcomes after LCBDE in the emergency setting are unknown. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes following elective and emergency LCBDE for choledocholithiasis. Methods Details of all patients who underwent LCBDE for choledocholithiasis between August 2003 and August 2013 were analysed retrospectively. The primary outcome measure was common bile duct (CBD) stone clearance rate. Secondary outcome measures were conversion rate, morbidity, mortality and length of hospital stay. Results Some 215 consecutive patients (57 male; median age 65 (range 14–92) years) underwent LCBDE. Some 121 procedures were performed electively and 94 as an emergency. Forty-five patients (48 per cent) presented with obstructive jaundice or cholangitis in the emergency LCBDE group compared with 15 (12·4 per cent) in the elective group (P < 0·001). The CBD stone clearance rate was similarly high in both groups (96 versus 96·7 per cent respectively; P = 0·557). There were no significant differences in conversion rate (6 versus 4·1 per cent), morbidity (5 versus 6·6 per cent), mortality (2 versus 0 per cent) or median length of stay (3 days) between groups. Two patients died, both following emergency LCBDE. Conclusion LCBDE can be performed safely and effectively in both elective and emergency settings.
Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Common Bile Duct, Male, Adolescent, Operative Time, Length of Stay, Middle Aged, Young Adult, Choledocholithiasis, Treatment Outcome, Elective Surgical Procedures, Humans, Female, Laparoscopy, Emergency Treatment, Aged, Retrospective Studies
Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Common Bile Duct, Male, Adolescent, Operative Time, Length of Stay, Middle Aged, Young Adult, Choledocholithiasis, Treatment Outcome, Elective Surgical Procedures, Humans, Female, Laparoscopy, Emergency Treatment, Aged, Retrospective Studies
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 31 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
