
doi: 10.1002/bjs.7078
pmid: 20632271
Abstract Background Reflux control may be ineffective in a substantial number of patients after endoluminal EsophyX® fundoplication for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Subsequent laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication (LNF) might be required to relieve symptoms. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome of LNF after previous EsophyX® fundoplication. Methods EsophyX® failure was defined as recurrence or persistence of typical symptoms, with or without anatomical failure of the wrap or persisting pathological oesophageal acid exposure. Consecutive patients who underwent LNF after failed EsophyX® fundoplication were identified. Symptomatic outcome was obtained by standardized questionnaire, and objective outcome by endoscopy, oesophageal manometry and pH monitoring. Results Eleven patients were included. During LNF, intraoperative gastric perforation occurred in two patients and one developed a subphrenic abscess after operation. Daily heartburn was present in one patient after LNF and three had troublesome daily dysphagia. General quality of life after LNF was not significantly better than that before EsophyX® fundoplication. Oesophageal acid exposure was normalized in all patients after surgery. Oesophagitis was absent after LNF in all except one patient who had persisting grade A oesophagitis. Conclusion Symptomatic and objective reflux control are satisfactory after LNF for a failed EsophyX® procedure. Previous EsophyX® fundoplication, however, is associated with a risk of gastric injury during LNF and a relatively high rate of postfundoplication dysphagia.
Male, Reoperation, Manometry, Fundoplication, Hydrogen-Ion Concentration, Middle Aged, Postoperative Complications, Recurrence, Gastroesophageal Reflux, Humans, Female, Laparoscopy, Prospective Studies, Treatment Failure
Male, Reoperation, Manometry, Fundoplication, Hydrogen-Ion Concentration, Middle Aged, Postoperative Complications, Recurrence, Gastroesophageal Reflux, Humans, Female, Laparoscopy, Prospective Studies, Treatment Failure
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 29 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
