
doi: 10.1002/bjs.5792
pmid: 17497651
Abstract Background Endoscopic thoracic sympathectomy (ETS) is an effective treatment for palmar hyperhidrosis and has been extended to craniofacial symptoms such as blushing and facial sweating. Adverse effects, including compensatory sweating, may cause patients to regret surgery. Such adverse events are currently unpredictable. This study investigated whether age, sex or bodyweight influenced the outcome. Methods A total of 110 patients who had bilateral ETS for palmar hyperhidrosis or facial symptoms (blushing or sweating) were asked to complete a questionnaire before and after surgery regarding physical and emotional symptoms, and overall satisfaction. Results Seventy-nine useable questionnaires were obtained. A decrease (an improvement) in physical symptom score was found in all patients; the median (interquartile range) change was − 15 (−9 to − 18) for facial symptoms and − 8 (−6·75 to − 9) for palmar symptoms. Similarly, there was an improvement in emotional symptom score of − 16 (−8 to − 28) for facial symptoms and − 13 (−7·25 to − 18·5) for palmar symptoms. More compensatory sweating was noted in those treated for facial symptoms (P = 0·007). There was no influence of age, sex or body mass index on outcome. Conclusion ETS is an effective treatment for palmar and facial symptoms. Side-effects may be worse in patients treated for facial symptoms.
Adult, Male, Blushing, Endoscopy, Thoracic Surgical Procedures, Severity of Illness Index, Postoperative Complications, Treatment Outcome, Patient Satisfaction, Surveys and Questionnaires, Quality of Life, Humans, Hyperhidrosis, Female, Prospective Studies, Sympathectomy
Adult, Male, Blushing, Endoscopy, Thoracic Surgical Procedures, Severity of Illness Index, Postoperative Complications, Treatment Outcome, Patient Satisfaction, Surveys and Questionnaires, Quality of Life, Humans, Hyperhidrosis, Female, Prospective Studies, Sympathectomy
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 18 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
