Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ British Journal of S...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
British Journal of Surgery
Article . 2007 . Peer-reviewed
License: OUP Standard Publication Reuse
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

The Swedish rectal cancer registry

Authors: L, Påhlman; M, Bohe; B, Cedermark; M, Dahlberg; G, Lindmark; R, Sjödahl; B, Ojerskog; +2 Authors

The Swedish rectal cancer registry

Abstract

Abstract Background An audit of all patients with rectal cancer in Sweden was launched in 1995. This is the first report from the Swedish Rectal Cancer Registry (SRCR). Methods Between 1995 and 2003, 13 434 patients treated for adenocarcinoma of the rectum were registered with the SRCR; there were approximately 1500 new patients annually. Results Approximately half had an anterior resection, a quarter an abdominoperineal resection and 15 per cent a Hartmann's procedure. The median 30-day postoperative mortality rate was 2·4 per cent and the overall postoperative morbidity rate was 35·0 per cent. The 5-year cancer-specific survival rate was 62·3 per cent. The 5-year relative survival rate was 70·1 per cent after anterior resection, 59·8 per cent after abdominoperineal resection and 39·8 per cent after a Hartmann's procedure. The crude 5-year local recurrence rate was 9·5 per cent overall, 6·1 per cent after preoperative radiotherapy and 11·4 per cent after surgery alone. For 3868 patients who had a locally curative procedure the local recurrence rate was 7·4 per cent overall, 5·9 per cent for those who had radiotherapy and 10·2 per cent for those who did not. The local recurrence rate was 2·9 per cent (28 of 968) for stage I disease, 7·9 per cent (112 of 1418) for stage II, 13·9 per cent (188 of 1357) for stage III and 8·5 per cent (45 of 532) for stage IV. Conclusion These good population-based results are due, in part, to the nationwide prospective quality assurance registration.

Keywords

Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Sweden, Time Factors, Rectal Neoplasms, Adenocarcinoma, Middle Aged, Survival Analysis, Postoperative Complications, Humans, Female, Registries, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local, Aged

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    349
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 1%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 1%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 1%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
349
Top 1%
Top 1%
Top 1%
hybrid