
doi: 10.1002/bjs.4949
pmid: 15898122
Abstract Background Resection for localized bronchiectasis is a well established therapy. However, there is little information on the role of surgery in non-localized bronchiectasis. Methods Between January 1992 and April 2001, 55 patients without cystic fibrosis underwent resection. Forty-eight patients (mean age 45 (range 23–74) years; 32 women) were available for long-term follow-up. Twenty-five patients underwent resection for localized disease (group 1) and 23 had bronchiectasis in at least two different lobes (group 2). Results Thirty-one of the 48 patients were treated by Video Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery (VATS) resection. There was no 30-day mortality. Mean duration of hospital stay was 10·9 (range 6–31) days in group 1 and 11·1 (range 5–19) days in group 2. Three of 25 patients in group 1 required reoperation. Only minor complications occurred in group 2 (three patients). Mean follow-up for both groups was 37 (range 6–97) months. Twenty-three of 25 patients in group 1 and 16 of 23 in group 2 reported satisfaction at 6 months after the operation. Recurrent infection was noted in three patients in each group. Haemoptysis recurred in only one patient in group 2. Conclusion The surgical treatment of selected patients with non-localized bronchiectasis was safe and most patients were satisfied with the outcome.
Adult, Male, Hemoptysis, Thoracic Surgery, Video-Assisted, Length of Stay, Middle Aged, Bronchiectasis, Recurrence, Chronic Disease, Humans, Female, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Respiratory Tract Infections, Aged
Adult, Male, Hemoptysis, Thoracic Surgery, Video-Assisted, Length of Stay, Middle Aged, Bronchiectasis, Recurrence, Chronic Disease, Humans, Female, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Respiratory Tract Infections, Aged
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 31 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
