
doi: 10.1002/bjs.4345
pmid: 14648735
AbstractBackgroundFew studies have assessed health-related quality of life (HRQoL) among patients undergoing cholecystectomy. This study aimed to determine clinical variables that predict changes in HRQoL following cholecystectomy.MethodsThis was a prospective study of consecutive patients undergoing elective cholecystectomy for gallstones in six hospitals. Patients were asked to complete two questionnaires—the Short Form 36 (SF-36) and the Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI)—before and 3 months after cholecystectomy. Multivariate linear regression models were used to examine factors potentially contributing to changes in HRQoL.ResultsPatients with symptomatic cholelithiasis and low surgical risk experienced the highest HRQoL gains in several SF-36 and GIQLI domains, with significant improvements in physical function detected by both instruments, compared with asymptomatic individuals at high surgical risk. Patients with asymptomatic cholelithiasis or high surgical risk experienced least improvement.ConclusionThese data indicate that cholecystectomy is appropriate for patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis and low surgical risk. In terms of HRQoL, the risk to benefit ratio seems poor for patients with asymptomatic gallstones.
Male, Analysis of Variance, Middle Aged, Sensitivity and Specificity, Cholelithiasis, Predictive Value of Tests, Risk Factors, Surveys and Questionnaires, Quality of Life, Humans, Regression Analysis, Cholecystectomy, Female, Prospective Studies, Aged
Male, Analysis of Variance, Middle Aged, Sensitivity and Specificity, Cholelithiasis, Predictive Value of Tests, Risk Factors, Surveys and Questionnaires, Quality of Life, Humans, Regression Analysis, Cholecystectomy, Female, Prospective Studies, Aged
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 36 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
