<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Reconstructive surgery for critical leg ischaemia (CLI) increased in both hospital- and population-based patient samples over 12 years. In the referral centre amputation numbers were unchanged over this period, although amputation carried out for patients with CLI decreased from 58 to 35 per cent. In the population sample amputation numbers decreased by 25 per cent and amputations of patients with CLI decreased from 79 to 43 per cent. Patient characteristics and amputation patterns were different in the two settings. Amputation rates as a measure of the efficacy of an arterial reconstruction policy should be used only on a population basis. The analysis is skewed by selection bias in referral centres.
Male, Leg, Treatment Outcome, Ischemia, Humans, Female, Surgery, Plastic, Amputation, Surgical, Aged, Retrospective Studies
Male, Leg, Treatment Outcome, Ischemia, Humans, Female, Surgery, Plastic, Amputation, Surgical, Aged, Retrospective Studies
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 26 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |