
pmid: 7648125
Abstract The success of laparoscopic cholecystectomy has been tarnished by the increased risk of bile duct damage associated with the operation. Many of these injuries can be managed by endoscopic techniques. Experience of such injuries between 1991 and 1994 was reviewed. Twenty-four patients were referred: 11 with injuries to the cystic duct alone, five with complete hepatic duct obstruction and eight with high bile duct leaks. All patients with leaks from the cystic duct were managed successfully endoscopically (sphincterotomy, four; stent, seven) without recourse to further surgery. Patients with complete obstruction were aided in their recovery by endoscopic and percutaneous techniques, either for postoperative problems (two patients) or in preparation for surgery (three). The eight patients with high bile duct leaks were managed endoscopically by stenting (seven patients) or sphincterotomy (one). Stenting appeared to encourage leaks to heal better than sphincterotomy alone; stents should probably be left in situ for 2 months before removal. There were no deaths and all but one patient had normal biliary function at follow-up. It is suggested that all suspected injuries after biliary surgery require management by a combination of interventional radiology and endoscopic interventional techniques. Surgery may be required only if there is complete obstruction of the biliary tree.
Adult, Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde, Male, Cholestasis, Hepatic Duct, Common, Middle Aged, Sphincterotomy, Transduodenal, Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic, Bile, Humans, Female, Stents, Bile Ducts, Aged, Follow-Up Studies, Retrospective Studies
Adult, Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde, Male, Cholestasis, Hepatic Duct, Common, Middle Aged, Sphincterotomy, Transduodenal, Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic, Bile, Humans, Female, Stents, Bile Ducts, Aged, Follow-Up Studies, Retrospective Studies
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 43 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
