Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ British Journal of S...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
British Journal of Surgery
Article . 1993 . Peer-reviewed
License: OUP Standard Publication Reuse
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Repeat hepatectomy for cancer

Authors: D, Elias; P, Lasser; J M, Hoang; J, Leclere; B, Debaene; C, Bognel; A, Spencer; +1 Authors

Repeat hepatectomy for cancer

Abstract

Abstract In a series of 279 hepatectomies performed for cancer between June 1984 and March 1992, 46 were repeat operations, for metastases in 41 patients. The primary tumour was in the colon and rectum (28 patients), APU Doma (five) and miscellaneous (eight). Repeat hepatectomies were performed in 26 per cent of patients who had recurrence after the first liver resection and in 40 per cent of those who had liver recurrence. An unsuspected extrahepatic recurrence was discovered and resected in eight instances and in two other cases a known extrahepatic recurrence was resected during the second hepatectomy. The hospital mortality rate was 2 per cent (one patient); the death was from nosocomial pneumonia. The total morbidity rate including minor complications was 32 per cent, with a higher frequency of haemorrhagic problems after secondary liver resection (12 per cent) than after primary hepatectomy (5 per cent). The rate of postoperative complications after repeat hepatectomy was related significantly to operative blood loss greater than 1500 ml(P = 0·04). The technical problems of repeat hepatectomy were: (1) re-exposure of the liver, considered to be difficult in 67 per cent of second liver resections and 80 per cent of third procedures; (2) the liver parenchyma, which often had histological modifications between first and second resections and was more difficult to ‘work’ as shown by the mean duration of clamping of the hepatic pedicle (54 min for secondary versus 36 min for primary liver resection); and (3) modification of the intraparenchymal vasculobiliary anatomy following liver regeneration after major hepatectomy. Intraoperative ultrasonography was of great benefit. Rates of crude and recurrence-free survival were relatively encouraging at 47 and 33 per cent 3 years after the second liver resection for the whole group. These values were lower for colorectal cancer (37 and 21 per cent 3 years after the second hepatectomy). These figures do not, however, convey the complete picture of the outcome for these patients. During the same follow-up period, 143 recurrences were detected and a mean of 2·9 resections per patient were performed. The indications for repeat hepatectomy are still to be clarified, although the surgical technique is safe.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Male, Reoperation, Time Factors, Liver Neoplasms, Blood Loss, Surgical, Middle Aged, Prognosis, Postoperative Complications, Hepatectomy, Humans, Female, Colorectal Neoplasms, Aged

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    100
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 1%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
100
Top 10%
Top 1%
Top 10%
hybrid
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research