<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
pmid: 2765846
Abstract Haemorrhage is a life-threatening complication in pancreatic disease. Twenty-five patients with this complication are described; 15 had major bleeding, nine had minor bleeding and one patient had a pseudoaneurysm identified at operation. Of the 15 patients with major bleeding, six presented with this complication and in nine cases it followed pancreatic resection. Of the six patients who presented with major bleeding, five underwent resection with one death while the patient managed conservatively died. The nine patients who had major bleeding after pancreatic resection were managed by ligation of the bleeding artery in six cases with one death, and one patient who rebled after ligation of the bleeding artery was successfully managed by further resection. Three patients with postresection major bleeding were managed conservatively with one death. All minor haemorrhages were managed conservatively without mortality. Deaths after major bleeding were a result of sepsis in three cases and respiratory failure in one. The severity of the underlying pancreatitis was an important factor in two patients. Pseudocysts and pancreatic fistulae were important underlying factors leading to the complication. It is recommended that patients with sepsis, a pancreatic fistula or severe underlying pancreatitis should have their haemorrhage treated by pancreatic resection, while those patients with bleeding following pancreatic resection without such complications can be managed by ligation.
Male, Pancreatectomy, Postoperative Complications, Humans, Pancreatic Diseases, Female, Hemorrhage, Middle Aged, Aged, Retrospective Studies
Male, Pancreatectomy, Postoperative Complications, Humans, Pancreatic Diseases, Female, Hemorrhage, Middle Aged, Aged, Retrospective Studies
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 69 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |