
pmid: 6498458
Abstract The reproducibility of anal sphincter manometry has been evaluated in 17 patients with a continuous pull-through technique using a miniature transducer mounted on a 2mm diameter Dacron catheter. Comparison was made with a conventional station pull-through technique using a 4mm diameter waterfilled microballoon connected to an external transducer. Parameters measured with the microtransducer (maximum resting pressure, squeeze pressure, functional sphincter length, area under high pressure zone, amplitude of rectosphincteric reflex) showed mean coefficients of variation from 3·2 to 5·7 per cent. Pressures measured with the microballoon were uniformly higher than those obtained with the microtransducer. The functional sphincter length was significantly shorter when measured with the microballoon (P < 0·001). The microtransducer provides a highly accurate and reproducible method of anorectal profilometry that avoids many of the drawbacks associated with fluid-filled systems.
Evaluation Studies as Topic, Manometry, Chronic Disease, Pressure, Rectum, Transducers, Pressure, Anal Canal, Humans, Constipation, Fecal Incontinence
Evaluation Studies as Topic, Manometry, Chronic Disease, Pressure, Rectum, Transducers, Pressure, Anal Canal, Humans, Constipation, Fecal Incontinence
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 49 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
