Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ British Journal of S...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
British Journal of Surgery
Article . 1984 . Peer-reviewed
License: OUP Standard Publication Reuse
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Anorectal profilometry with the microtransducer

Authors: J S, Varma; A N, Smith;

Anorectal profilometry with the microtransducer

Abstract

Abstract The reproducibility of anal sphincter manometry has been evaluated in 17 patients with a continuous pull-through technique using a miniature transducer mounted on a 2mm diameter Dacron catheter. Comparison was made with a conventional station pull-through technique using a 4mm diameter waterfilled microballoon connected to an external transducer. Parameters measured with the microtransducer (maximum resting pressure, squeeze pressure, functional sphincter length, area under high pressure zone, amplitude of rectosphincteric reflex) showed mean coefficients of variation from 3·2 to 5·7 per cent. Pressures measured with the microballoon were uniformly higher than those obtained with the microtransducer. The functional sphincter length was significantly shorter when measured with the microballoon (P < 0·001). The microtransducer provides a highly accurate and reproducible method of anorectal profilometry that avoids many of the drawbacks associated with fluid-filled systems.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Evaluation Studies as Topic, Manometry, Chronic Disease, Pressure, Rectum, Transducers, Pressure, Anal Canal, Humans, Constipation, Fecal Incontinence

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    49
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 1%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
49
Average
Top 1%
Top 10%
hybrid