Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ British Journal of S...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
British Journal of Surgery
Article . 1981 . Peer-reviewed
License: OUP Standard Publication Reuse
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Reconstructive gastric surgery

Authors: K A, Kelly; J M, Becker; J A, van Heerden;

Reconstructive gastric surgery

Abstract

Summary Among 173 patients undergoing reconstructive gastric operations, including 115 patients who received Roux-en-Y gastrojejunostomy, 25 with jejunal interpositions, 11 with conversion of Billroth II to Billroth I, 8 with closure of gastroenterostomy, 5 with pyloric reconstruction and 9 with other operations, only 2 immediate postoperative mortalities occurred. A perfect or good result was obtained in 108 of 156 patients (69 per cent) at long term follow-up, while a fair result was achieved in 35 patients (22 per cent) and a poor result in 13 patients (9 per cent). We concluded that reconstructive gastric operations were safe and had clearly improved 7 of 10 patients in this series.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Male, Reoperation, Time Factors, Stomach, Stomach Diseases, Middle Aged, Jejunum, Postoperative Complications, Duodenal Ulcer, Methods, Humans, Female, Pylorus, Aged

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    67
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
67
Average
Top 10%
Top 10%
hybrid