Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ British Journal of S...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
British Journal of Surgery
Article . 1981 . Peer-reviewed
License: OUP Standard Publication Reuse
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Endoscopic sphincterotomy: Indications and results

Authors: G, Viceconte; G W, Viceconte; V, Pietropaolo; A, Montori;

Endoscopic sphincterotomy: Indications and results

Abstract

Summary Endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES) is a simple, effective and remarkably safe method of treatment of choledocholithiasis and papillary stenosis. In this series, ES was technically successful in 255 (86·1 per cent) of 296 patients in whom it was attempted. Forty-nine of the successful cases had papillary stenosis complicated by pain, cholangitis and/or jaundice in patients after cholecystectomy; 205 had choledocholithiasis, of whom 164 had a cholecystectomy and 41 were poor surgical risks and did not have cholecystectomy. One patient had a tumour of the ampulla of Vater. ES has been performed as an emergency in 16 subjects because of severe septic cholangitis in 11 and acute biliary pancreatitis in 5. Of the 205 patients with choledocholithiasis, spontaneous passage of calculi after ES occurred in 151 cases (73·6 per cent), and instrumental extraction of stones was possible in 44 (21·5 per cent); 10 patients (4·9 per cent) had residual stones and required surgery. In this series the overall success rate of ES in removing common bile duct stones was 82 per cent in 238 cases; in the patients with benign papillary stenosis ES was successful in relieving symptoms and biochemical cholestasis in 72 per cent of 57 cases. Complications occurred in 18 cases (7 per cent): cholangitis in 4 (1·6 per cent) and haemorrhage in 14 (5·4 per cent). Two patients (0·8 per cent) with acute bleeding following ES died; in one of these surgery had been performed to arrest the haemorrhage, but the patient died 3 days after operation of hepatorenal failure. The other complications were treated conservatively without mortality.

Keywords

Adult, Male, Ampulla of Vater, Common Bile Duct Diseases, Common Bile Duct Neoplasms, Endoscopy, Constriction, Pathologic, Gallstones, Middle Aged, Postoperative Complications, Humans, Cholecystectomy, Female, Aged

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    41
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 1%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
41
Average
Top 1%
Top 10%
hybrid