
pmid: 1115874
Abstract A technique for abdominal lavage is described and was used to evaluate the abdomen of 671 multiple trauma victims. In 44 per cent (299 cases) there was a bloodstained return and these were regarded as positive. Patients with a positive result underwent exploratory laparotomy which revealed that 89 per cent had significant intra-abdominal trauma requiring a surgical procedure, 8 per cent had trauma which did not require any active surgical correction and 3 per cent had no abnormal findings. Of all the lavages performed, there were 0.11 per cent false positive and 0.03 per cent false negative results. The value of the test in the context of multiple trauma is emphasized.
Adult, Laparotomy, Cytodiagnosis, Hemorrhage, Abdominal Injuries, Catheterization, Liver, Intestine, Small, Drainage, Humans, False Positive Reactions, Child, False Negative Reactions, Spleen
Adult, Laparotomy, Cytodiagnosis, Hemorrhage, Abdominal Injuries, Catheterization, Liver, Intestine, Small, Drainage, Humans, False Positive Reactions, Child, False Negative Reactions, Spleen
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 31 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
