
doi: 10.1002/bjs.10238
pmid: 28199017
Analysis of time-to-event (“survival”) data typically requires two pieces of data that are taken into account simultaneously: i) the time period for which follow-up was available, and ii) the status at the end of the follow-up. The former variable is continuous (time) and the latter categorical, specifying whether the endpoint was the event under study, such as death or relapse had occurred, or if whether it had yet to occur when follow-up end. Follow-up times often varies between individuals in a study due to recruitment over time and also due to withdrawal from follow-up, loss-to-follow-up or the occurrence of another event (e.g. death from an unrelated cause), often referred to as a competing risk, which precludes the occurrence of the event of interest (e.g. recurrence of the disease of interest).
Humans, Kaplan-Meier Estimate, Risk Assessment, Survival Analysis
Humans, Kaplan-Meier Estimate, Risk Assessment, Survival Analysis
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 114 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
