Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2019
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Biotechnology and Bioengineering
Article . 2019 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
Biotechnology and Bioengineering
Article
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Sygma
versions View all 5 versions
addClaim

A simplified techno‐economic model for the molecular pharming of antibodies

Authors: Pere Mir‐Artigues; Richard M. Twyman; Derry Alvarez; Pedro Cerda Bennasser; Merce Balcells; Paul Christou; Teresa Capell;

A simplified techno‐economic model for the molecular pharming of antibodies

Abstract

AbstractBy the end of 2017, the Food and Drug Administration had approved a total of 77 therapeutic monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), most of which are still manufactured today. Furthermore, global sales of mAbs topped $90 billion in 2017 and are projected to reach $125 billion by 2020. The mAbs approved for human therapy are mostly produced using Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells, which require expensive infrastructure for production and purification. Molecular pharming in plants is an alternative approach with the benefits of lower costs, greater scalability, and intrinsic safety. For some platforms, the production cycle is also much quicker. But do these advantages really stack up in economic terms? Earlier techno‐economic evaluations have focused on specific platforms or processes and have used different methods, making direct comparisons challenging and the overall benefits of molecular pharming difficult to gauge. Here, we present a simplified techno‐economic model for the manufacturing of mAbs, which can be applied to any production platform by focusing on the most important factors that determine the efficiency and cost of bulk drug manufacturing. This model develops economic concepts to identify variables that can be used to achieve cost savings by simultaneously modeling the dynamic costs of upstream production at different scales and the corresponding downstream processing costs for different manufacturing modes (sequential, serial, and continuous). The use of simplified models will help to achieve meaningful comparisons between diverse manufacturing technologies.

Keywords

techno‐economic analysis, protein manufacturing, therapeutic antibodies, Antibodies, Monoclonal, CHO Cells, Recombinant Proteins, downstream processing, Cricetulus, Animals, upstream production, Biotechnology

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    30
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 3
    download downloads 33
  • 3
    views
    33
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
30
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
3
33
Green