
doi: 10.1002/bit.21121
pmid: 16894633
AbstractWe report the encapsulation of MIN6 cells, a pancreatic β‐cell line, using thermally induced gelable materials. This strategy uses aqueous solvent and mild temperatures during encapsulation, thereby minimizing adverse effects on cell function and viability. Using a 2:1 mixture of PNIPAAm‐PEG‐PNIPAAm tri‐block copolymer and PNIPAAm homopolymer that exhibit reversible sol‐to‐gel transition at ∼30°C, gels were formed that exhibit mechanical integrity, and are stable in H2O, PBS and complete DMEM with negligible mass loss at 37°C for 60 days. MTT assays showed undetectable cytotoxicity of the polymers towards MIN6 cells. A simple microencapsulation process was developed using vertical co‐extrusion and a 37°C capsule collection bath containing a paraffin layer above DMEM. Spherical capsules with diameters ranging from 500 to 900 µm were formed. SEM images of freeze‐dried capsules with PBS as the core solution showed homogenous gel capsule membranes. Confocal microscopy revealed that the encapsulated cells tended to form small aggregates over 5 days, and staining for live and dead cells showed high viability post‐encapsulation. A static glucose challenge with day‐5 cultured microencapsulated cells exhibited glucose‐dependent insulin secretion comparable to controls of free MIN6 cells grown in monolayers. These results demonstrate the potential use of these thermo‐responsive polymers as cell encapsulation membranes. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2007;96: 146–155. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Hot Temperature, Tissue Engineering, Cell Survival, Acrylic Resins, Cell Culture Techniques, Cell Line, Islets of Langerhans, Mice, Coated Materials, Biocompatible, Materials Testing, Animals
Hot Temperature, Tissue Engineering, Cell Survival, Acrylic Resins, Cell Culture Techniques, Cell Line, Islets of Langerhans, Mice, Coated Materials, Biocompatible, Materials Testing, Animals
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 34 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
