
AbstractA submerged membrane bioreactor (MBR) with a working volume of 1.4 L and a hollow fiber microfiltration membrane was used to treat a contaminated raw water supply at a short hydraulic retention time (HRT) of ∼1 h. Filtration flux tests were conducted regularly on the membrane to determine various fouling resistances, and confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) were employed to characterize the biofouling development and sludge cake formation on the membrane. The experimental results demonstrate that the MBR is highly effective in drinking water treatment for the removal of organic pollutants, ammonia, and UV absorbance. During the MBR operation, the fouling materials were not uniformly distributed on the entire surface of all of the membrane fibers. The membrane was covered partially by a static sludge cake that could not be removed by the shear force of aeration, and partially by a thin sludge film that was frequently washed away by aeration turbulence. The filtration resistance coefficients were 308.4 × 1011 m−1 on average for the sludge cake, 32.5 × 1011 m−1 on average for the dynamic sludge film, and increased from 10.5 × 1011 to 59.7 × 1011 m−1 for the membrane pore fouling after 10 weeks of MBR operation at a filtration flux of 0.5 m3/m2·d. Polysaccharides and other biopolymers were found to accumulate on the membrane, and hence decreased membrane permeability. More important, the adsorption of biopolymers on the membrane modified its surface property and led to easier biomass attachment and tighter sludge cake deposition, which resulted in a progressive sludge cake growth and serious membrane fouling. The sludge cake coverage on the membrane can be minimized by the separation, with adequate space, of the membrane filters, to which sufficient aeration turbulence can then be applied. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Microfluidics, Cell Culture Techniques, Ultrafiltration, Pilot Projects, Cell Culture Techniques - instrumentation - methods, Models, Biological, Water Purification, Microfluidics - instrumentation - methods, Bioreactors, Models, Computer Simulation, Biomass, Cell Proliferation, Membranes, Bacteria, 660, Sewage, Ultrafiltration - instrumentation - methods, Refuse Disposal - instrumentation - methods, Membranes, Artificial, Aerobic - cytology - physiology, Biological, Refuse Disposal, Bacteria, Aerobic, Equipment Failure Analysis, Bioreactors - microbiology, Artificial, Bacteria, Aerobic - cytology - physiology, Sewage - microbiology, Water Purification - instrumentation - methods
Microfluidics, Cell Culture Techniques, Ultrafiltration, Pilot Projects, Cell Culture Techniques - instrumentation - methods, Models, Biological, Water Purification, Microfluidics - instrumentation - methods, Bioreactors, Models, Computer Simulation, Biomass, Cell Proliferation, Membranes, Bacteria, 660, Sewage, Ultrafiltration - instrumentation - methods, Refuse Disposal - instrumentation - methods, Membranes, Artificial, Aerobic - cytology - physiology, Biological, Refuse Disposal, Bacteria, Aerobic, Equipment Failure Analysis, Bioreactors - microbiology, Artificial, Bacteria, Aerobic - cytology - physiology, Sewage - microbiology, Water Purification - instrumentation - methods
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 156 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
